![]() |
| Lorena Goxhobelli in a public speech |
The closure has caused serious concern among residents, who now must travel to Tirana or Fier to access services that were previously available locally. For many citizens—especially the elderly and those with limited financial means—this shift translates into higher transportation costs, longer delays, and increased bureaucratic burden.
Reports indicate that part of the staff has been transferred to Tirana, another part to Fier, while employees who refused either relocation risk losing their jobs altogether. This approach reflects a lack of strategic planning and institutional respect, treating experienced civil servants as expendable and ignoring the human and social cost of such decisions.
Critics argue that the move exposes a deeply centralized and detached bureaucratic mindset, one that prioritizes administrative reshuffling over the real needs of citizens. Decisions of this magnitude were taken without transparent explanations, public consultation, or a clear transition plan, undermining trust in public administration and disrupting the normal functioning of essential services.
Adding to the concern, Prime Minister Edi Rama has warned that the Vlora case is only the beginning, announcing plans to dissolve other regional Cadastre offices across Albania. According to the government, services will be offered online through the e-Albania platform. However, this promise is met with skepticism, as the platform has repeatedly suffered from technical failures, system overloads, and long processing delays.
The forced virtualization of services, without ensuring functional digital infrastructure and on-the-ground support, risks turning access to property rights into an administrative maze rather than a public service. Moreover, the policy raises serious questions about the future of hundreds of experienced employees who have dedicated years to these institutions.
The closure of the Vlora Cadastre Office is not merely an administrative adjustment—it is a warning sign of a broader institutional centralization that may weaken public services nationwide. Without accountability, transparency, and realistic implementation, such reforms threaten to deepen citizen frustration and further erode confidence in the state’s ability to govern effectively.
