In recent days, a concerning message has begun circulating across social media in Slovenia. The message calls on Slovenians to boycott Albanian bakeries—businesses owned mainly by Albanians from Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Albania who have built a strong presence in the country over the last three decades. According to those spreading the message, the call for boycott comes as a reaction to the behavior of Kosovar fans during the playing of the Slovenian national anthem at a football match held a few days earlier.
 |
| A bakery and pastry shop owned by an Albanian in Lunjane, Slovenia |
How the Boycott Message Started
The boycott began as a simple post on social media, urging Slovenians to stop supporting Albanian-owned bakeries. These bakeries—often family-run and widely popular—are known for their fresh bread, pastries, and friendly service. Yet, in this case, they have become symbolic targets in a dispute that has little to do with business and far more to do with sports nationalism and cultural misunderstanding.
Petkovšek’s post reads:
“BOYCOTT ALBANIAN BAKERIES! Due to the recent events and the behavior of Kosovo Albanians toward the Slovenian anthem, I call on all Slovenians to boycott Albanian bakeries!”
This message was posted publicly on Facebook and accompanied by photographs of specific Albanian businesses, essentially singling them out. As with many social-media-driven reactions, the post quickly gathered comments, shares, and supportive reactions.
Reactions in the Comment Section: Support and Escalation
What stands out is the tone and content of the comments under Petkovšek’s post. Many commenters appear strongly supportive of the boycott, claiming they have already been avoiding Albanian bakeries for years. Others go even further, suggesting that additional Albanian-owned businesses—beyond bakeries—should also be included in the boycott.
This type of reaction risks fueling broader social tension. While the original frustration stemmed from a sports-related incident, the online discussion has shifted toward generalizations about Albanian communities in Slovenia. Some users have even suggested targeting restaurants, markets, or service shops run by Albanians, indicating a worrying trend of xenophobia developing from what should have remained a football-related disagreement.
Context: Why Albanian Businesses in Slovenia Matter
For decades, Albanians have been active contributors to Slovenian society. Many arrived as workers during the Yugoslav period or as migrants seeking better opportunities. Today, they represent a vital part of Slovenia’s economic landscape, especially in hospitality, construction, and food services.
Albanian bakeries, in particular, have become a cultural staple across Slovenian towns and cities. Their popularity comes from the quality of their bread and their commitment to long working hours, often opening early in the morning and closing late at night. These businesses are known for employing locals, paying taxes, and integrating well into the community.
For many Slovenians, Albanian bakeries are simply part of everyday life. Therefore, a call for boycott creates economic uncertainty not only for Albanian families but also for Slovenian workers who depend on these businesses.
The Football Match Incident: A Misplaced Reaction?
The root of this tension lies in how some Kosovar fans behaved when the Slovenian anthem was played before a recent match. While reactions during football events are often emotional and sometimes controversial, they rarely reflect the views or actions of entire communities. To generalize from a group of fans to an entire diaspora is neither fair nor constructive.
Moreover, the majority of Albanians in Slovenia had nothing to do with the event. Many expressed respect for Slovenia and its national symbols, considering the country a place that offers stability and opportunities for their families.
The Dangers of Turning Online Emotions Into Real-Life Boycotts
Social media outrage can often create real-life consequences. Boycotting small businesses based on ethnicity risks damaging the social fabric between communities that have co-existed peacefully for years.
A boycott does not resolve political disagreements nor does it encourage dialogue. Instead, it deepens divisions and threatens the inclusive values that Slovenia has long sought to promote.
From an Albanian perspective—whether living in Slovenia or watching the situation unfold from Albania, Kosovo, or North Macedonia—this incident is a reminder of how quickly public sentiment can shift and how important it is for communities to continue fostering mutual respect.
Conclusion: A Moment for Reflection, Not Escalation
While the viral boycott message has caused concern among Albanians, it should also serve as an opportunity for responsible voices in both communities to step forward. The relationship between Slovenians and Albanians has historically been cooperative and business-friendly, and it would be a mistake for temporary emotions to create long-term damage.
Dialogue, understanding, and community solidarity remain the only effective paths forward.