What should have been a relaxing holiday in Antalya, Turkey, turned into a nightmare for Agim B.*, a Swiss citizen of Albanian descent. Instead of checking into his hotel with his partner, he was held by border police, accused of being a Russian propagandist, and deported back to Switzerland. The bizarre incident, reported by blick.ch has raised questions about mistaken identity, bureaucratic indifference, and the limits of consular protection.
 |
| Antalya Airport |
A Holiday Gone Wrong
Everything seemed normal when Agim B. and his girlfriend arrived at Antalya Airport last Thursday afternoon. The couple was looking forward to their vacation under the Turkish sun. His partner passed the passport control without difficulty, but Agim was suddenly stopped.
According to their testimony, the border guard repeatedly scanned his Swiss passport, but an alert kept appearing on the screen. This immediately triggered suspicion. A police officer was called, and soon after, the couple was taken aside.
Instead of being welcomed as tourists, they were directed to a waiting area normally reserved for rejected asylum seekers and individuals facing deportation. “It was surreal,” recalls Agim. “I hadn’t done anything wrong, yet I was treated as if I were a criminal.”
Accusations of Being a Russian Propagandist
The explanation given by Turkish authorities shocked the couple: Agim was allegedly flagged as a Russian propagandist who had published anti-Turkish videos on social media. The problem? Agim insists he barely posts anything online, let alone political content.
Despite presenting his Swiss passport, his clean record, and his complete lack of online propaganda, the officials refused to reconsider. Instead, he was interrogated and held in limbo, with no clear path to appeal or defend himself.
Left Without Consular Help
In desperation, Agim called the Swiss Consulate General in Istanbul. But instead of direct intervention, he was referred to the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA) helpline in Bern. To his disappointment, he was told his case did not qualify as an “emergency.”
Instead, he was sent an email with a list of Turkish lawyers he could contact if he wanted to file a complaint. Each lawyer demanded an upfront fee of 400 to 500 Swiss francs—a steep amount for a situation Agim insists was completely unjust.
Feeling abandoned, Agim described the Swiss response as cold and bureaucratic. “I expected my country to stand by me, but they did nothing,” he told Blick.
A Long Night in Detention
Hours dragged on in the holding area. The couple was given no food, no clear updates, and little information. At one point, Agim’s phone line was cut because he had not activated international roaming with his Swiss provider Salt, leaving him even more isolated.
Only at 1 a.m. was he informed he would be deported on a flight back to Switzerland at 7 the next morning. His holiday was over before it even began.
Financial and Emotional Costs
The consequences were not only emotional but also financial. Agim and his partner are now left with four-digit hotel costs they cannot reclaim, as well as a hefty mobile phone bill due to his urgent calls. For a trip that was supposed to bring joy and rest, the damage—financial, psychological, and reputational—was severe.
Upon his return to Switzerland, Agim voiced deep disappointment. “I am extremely frustrated. The Swiss authorities did nothing to help us,” he concluded.
FDFA’s Official Response
When asked by Blick, the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs confirmed the helpline call but defended its limited role. “The FDFA cannot obtain entry permits for third countries. Assistance from the FDFA only applies once the affected individuals have made all reasonable efforts themselves to overcome the emergency, both organizationally and financially,” the department stated.
While this may be technically accurate, for ordinary citizens it highlights a troubling gap. For those wrongly detained or misidentified abroad, consular help can feel more symbolic than practical.
Larger Implications
The case of Agim B. underscores the vulnerability of travelers in an age of heightened border security and international tensions. Being mistakenly flagged by electronic systems can instantly transform a law-abiding tourist into a suspected criminal. Without immediate intervention, reputations and lives can be seriously disrupted.
It also raises questions about how Turkish border authorities gather and share intelligence, and whether errors in databases are ever corrected. For the Swiss-Albanian traveler, the ordeal was not simply a personal inconvenience—it was a stark reminder of how fragile individual rights can become when caught between state security and bureaucratic indifference.
For now, Agim and his partner are left with the bitter memory of a ruined vacation, financial losses, and a profound sense of abandonment. His case serves as a warning for other travelers: even with the “right” passport, no one is immune to mistaken identity at international borders.
Whether Turkey will review its databases or whether Switzerland will reconsider its approach to consular assistance remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: for Agim, the dream of a simple holiday in Antalya turned into a nightmare of suspicion, detention, and deportation.