In the age of digital finance, crime has also evolved. Gone are the days when illegal wealth was hidden in wallets or under mattress springs. Today, it’s concealed in codes, servers, and virtual wallets. Every seizure now includes assets that are intangible—yet very real. They must be stored, counted, and managed.
But what happens when the asset isn’t physical? When it exists only in a network, under a 64-digit code, and can vanish with a single click?
The Albanian Case: Tens of millions of euros in frozen crypto, no home to keep them
In recent years, Prokuroria e Posaçme për Korrupsionin dhe Krimin e Organizuar (SPAK) in Albania has reportedly seized cryptocurrencies worth over €11 million linked to organized crime. Vox News Albania+2Pamfleti+2
Yet they do not have a state-run digital wallet in which to store such assets—meaning the seized funds sit in limbo, existing but un-usable by the state.
When you deal in crypto, “possession” means holding a private key. If the key is lost or if the wallet isn’t under secure state control, the money is just code floating in cyberspace.
Why it matters: The gap between tech and justice
1. Assets move at light speed
Criminals increasingly use cryptocurrencies to move and hide illicit funds in the Western Balkans. The problem: traditional law enforcement and asset-management frameworks were built for cash, real estate or tangible goods—not digital money that can vanish or be moved globally in seconds.
2. Tracing is complex but storing is even harder
Sure, you can trace that an address sent funds—but once it’s frozen, where do you store them? In many Western Balkan countries—including Albania—there is no infrastructure (hardware wallet, state-custodied wallet, audit logs) to manage these seized assets.
3. Legal frameworks lag behind
Albania’s confiscation laws are largely designed for physical assets. The legislation doesn’t clearly define how to freeze, transfer to state custody, or dispose of crypto assets. Without this clarity, a “seizure” may serve little purpose beyond the initial freeze.
A global chase: Justice vs. Technology
From Berlin to London, Vilnius to Tirana, justice systems are scrambling to catch up with digital finance. It’s a race with high stakes: each delay could mean millions of euros slipping out of state reach into anonymous wallets.
In the case of Albania, the state had to ask for help abroad, because it didn’t have the infrastructure internally to manage the seized crypto.
What needs to happen: Closing the digital-asset loop
-
Build a certified state wallet: A government-controlled digital wallet system (or partnership with a trusted provider), with multi-signature custody, offline (“cold”) storage, and audit logs.
-
Update laws: Define crypto assets in the asset-seizure laws, set out procedures for transfer, freeze, confiscation and disposal.
-
Train teams: Equip prosecutors, financial-investigation units and asset-management agencies with blockchain-analysis tools and procedures. Increase transparency: The public must trust that the state is handling “frozen millions” appropriately. Without visibility, the integrity of asset-seizure regimes is weakened.
-
Regional cooperation: Because crypto crosses borders, collaboration with EU partners, exchanges and blockchain-analytics firms is essential.
Why this is more than finance—it’s about justice
The “frozen millions” in crypto aren’t just about value. They’re evidence of criminal activity. They demonstrate the reach of organized crime into digital finance. If the state fails to secure them, it sends a signal: “You may commit crime digitally—and we may freeze you—but we can’t necessarily take your assets afterwards.”
For Albania, this is a test of whether its justice system is ready for the digital age.
In a world where criminals speak in code, justice must learn the same language. Those tens of millions in crypto are not just dollars or euros—they are a mirror reflecting how far behind the system might be. Without the key to the wallet, the state loses not only the money, but the evidence and the deterrent.